Subscribe by Email

Your email:

Pages

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The real CSR debate: why aren’t we helping practitioners?

  
  
  

Economist Edward Glaeser’s recent New York Times blog posting on “how ethical should businesses be?” is yet another example of the disconnection between public debate and what companies really need: help with implementation.

While briefly surveying arguments for and against CSR, Glaeser allows that “Even the harshest critics of corporate social responsibility are not advocates of sacrificing long-term profits by acting unethically today,” but quickly moves on to the “hard problems” of defining corporate roles beyond profit-maximization, as if companies already had the win-win items covered.

Not so fast.  According to recent research by Boston College’s Center for Corporate Citizenship, most corporations have not yet integrated CSR with their sales, marketing, HR, government affairs, or other core functional areas.  Corporate citizenship practitioners remain siloed and under-resourced, and still struggle to operationalize the classic CSR win-win.  As usual, implementation is more easily said than done.

What’s needed – at least until sustainability and corporate responsibility become part of mainstream corporate culture and decisionmaking – is greater cross-functional interaction, so CSR managers can tap and guide the expertise within their companies to identify and operationalize opportunities.

Identification is important because there is no “one size fits all” list of strategic CSR programs: a volunteer program may develop new, relevant skills for one type of company and not another; a ride-sharing or telecommuting policy may significantly increase productivity and reduce environmental impact for one type of industry and not another; a cause-marketing program may give a significant boost to one type of product but not another.

Simply getting the relevant functional managers at the table to review or brainstorm ideas can be a surprisingly easy way to identify truly relevant and impactful opportunities (often involving only minor adjustment or coordination of existing activities).  And if these opportunities are truly a win-win, then everyone will be motivated to help operationalize them.

For CSR managers struggling to make progress within their companies, try one step at a time.  Develop a relationship with the recruiting department and see if any of your community engagement activities or sponsorships can be designed to attract the attention of potential recruits, or create opportunities to interact with and better vet current candidates.  The results (and ROI) of any program you agree on can usually be monitored and measured through minor adjustments to existing application tracking systems or new-hire interviews.

Or start with marketing, or professional development, or any other department that your programs might be able to help.

Meanwhile, don’t get too distracted by public “debates” over CSR.  They may be intellectually interesting, but often they offer little assistance in creating real value: that is, actually implementing this stuff.

true impact

Comments

How does one prevent CSR from being, or being seen, as just spin on business as usual? Identifying ways to leverage CSR for the business is smart, and advances the business as well as the cause. Likewise for identifying current activities that align with CSR principles. Yet, if businesses don’t go beyond this and take responsibility for their impact, which will require some investments with less attractive ROIs (e.g., reduce GHG emissions per IPCC recommendations, is that CSR? Is waiting till these things become regulated, and simply meeting regulations while chasing only cost savings/revenue opportunities, CSR?
Posted @ Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:49 AM by Stephanee
Hi Stephanee, thanks for your post. I think you’re getting at the classic “greenwashing” issue - where companies are censured for trying to score PR points for talking up CSR, but not taking substantive action in operating more responsibly. 
 
A fair rule of thumb, I think, is to thrive for “authenticity.” That is, if your company commits to specific goals or practices, those goals and practices should be applied consistently among all related management decisions, and not just when it’s easy or likely to result in PR points. 
 
BC’s Center for Corporate Citizenship has a developed a five stage hierarchy of corporate citizenship, from reactive (”compliant”) to fully integrated and proactive (”transformative”). As you suggest, the real benefits for everyone - businesses and society - lie increasingly along the higher stages of that grid.
Posted @ Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:51 AM by Farron Levy
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics